ACCOUNTANTS

Saturday, 15 September 2012

ADOPTION OF IFRS AND ITS IMPACT ON IT SYSTEMS IN NIGERIA

How adoption of IFRS will impact IT systems in Nigeria

 
The directive by regulatory bodies for companies to adopt International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as the new basis of financial reporting, and the release of the adoption roadmap, requires that companies quoted on The Nigerian Stock Exchange (NSE) publish their financial statements in accordance with IFRS with effect from years ended 31 December 2012.
This effectively means that the transition day to IFRS is1 January 2011: on this date, the organization is required to prepare its “opening balance sheet” in accordance with IFRS. It is quite surprising that as of now, most of the organizations in that category are yet to start the transition process.
This is probably due to misconceptions surrounding the conversion to IFRS; many think it’s just an “accounting event” that can be handled by “Corporate/Finance”, some others think it’s simply a need for new templates and rollups in their financial reporting applications that it has no real impact on other areas of the business and the people involved. Perhaps some are just not yet bothered and think it can be handled in their typical “fire brigade approach” at the last minute. It is even more startling that some companies assumed they have already converted to IFRS when, in reality, they haven’t. A banker recently told me that his bank has converted to IFRS over 2 years ago and I immediately knew where he was missing it. It is possible to ‘convert’ your audited financial statement to IFRS, but this is entirely different from recording of daily transactions on IT systems in accordance with IFRS, which is what we should already be doing.
It will come as a surprise to many especially the unprepared that the IFRS adoption is an event that will affect IT systems to their core; something that requires planning and coordination across functional lines (accounting, tax, treasury, HR, IT) and it is only through well planned execution before a company can benefit from its adoption. Viewing the adoption of IFRS as simply a reporting change can lead to costly rework at a later date and/or cumbersome and inefficient processes.
A typical IT environment supporting financial processing has five components - Source Systems, General Ledger, Data Warehouse, Reporting System and the physical Infrastructure. IFRS adoption may impact all these components depending on the industry and the level of standardized systems and data in an organization.
Some examples of IT areas that may be impacted by IFRS include:
-General provision of 1% on performing loan already configured on bank’s IT systems may need to be replaced by specific provision while the current provisioning method for “non-performing loans” may be replaced by’ source systems’ that captures the result of impairment tests according to IAS 39.
-IT systems should be able to breakdown and recognize information components of Property, Plant and Equipment in line with IFRS 8.
-IT systems that maintain spot exchange rates may replace the use of average quarterly or annual exchange rates by some entities for their foreign currency transactions.
-Effective interest rate for income recognition may be configured on IT systems to replace the current method being adopted by some financial institutions.
In order to see the whole picture of IT system changes that would be required, organizations need to spend time understanding the technical accounting difference between Nigerian GAAP (SAS, CAMA, BOFIA, SEC Rules)and IFRS as it relates to their own operation, thereby identifying the key impact on IT, and strategically designing future state systems. The time to do so is NOW.
I find it mind-boggling that some companies have already issued request for proposals to reputable IT vendors seeking for middleware to address IFRS conversion issues without first taking time to understand the technical accounting difference between their current reporting requirements and IFRS. Just as it doesn’t make much sense to recruit someone before consideration is given to drawing up his job description, organizations need to prepare a functional requirement blueprint that stems out of a detailed gap analysis between the capabilities of your current IT systems and required future state systems that is “IFRS compliant”.
It may interest you to know that in other parts of the world where IFRS have been adopted, some organizations had 3 to 5 years conversion plan in order to benefit maximally from the adoption of IFRS. In Nigeria, we are already beyond the transition date and with just a few months left to 2012, quoted companies and significant public entities will have to work harder and faster if their conversion must be successful.
It is pertinent to mention that companies should implement IFRS in a way that makes sense for their organization. No One Size fits all. The assessment phase is crucial. During a thorough assessment phase, you can evaluate cost/benefit trade-offs carefully. Project Management is also crucial to a successful adoption of IFRS; a project management office should be set up to establish a program structure to develop the IFRS conversion roadmap.
IFRS adoption has some benefits and organizations should view the conversion as an opportunity to consider the long term vision/plan for an information platform. System design should include an adequate level of flexibility to incorporate additional accounting and regulatory changes in the future. The program should include a strategic knowledge transfer plan to convert the new processes into the “business-as-usual” state. The key to achieving benefits to IFRS is to understand that it’s not just accounting. Starting to understand where you are today will help you lay out a roadmap to be ready when it’s time to “flip the switch”.

N5000 NOTE: JONATHAN PUSHES FOR A SHOW DOWN WITH NIGERIANS

N5,000 NOTE: Jonathan pushes for a show down with Nigerians

On September 8, 2012 · In Special Report
3:07 am
 4

   Jumping from one inconclusive economic and political issue to another appears to be a factor that is fast defining the Presidency of Nigeria’s Dr. Goodluck Jonathan.
The latest move of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN to convert the current N5, N10 and N20 notes to coins and also step the currency note to N5,000 denomination by 2013 which has already gotten the nod of the President amidst mountainous agitations by Nigerians has become one controversial issue in the life of the nation at the moment.
Will the ruling class have its way as against the wish of most Nigerians? That seems to be the question Saturday Vanguard’s JOHN BULUS tries to find answers to in this special report.
“I will continue to fight for your future, because I am one of you. I will continue to fight, for improved medical care for all our citizens. I will continue to fight for all citizens to have access to first class education. I will continue to fight for electricity to be available to all our citizens.
I will continue to fight for an efficient and affordable public transport system for all our people. I will continue to fight for jobs to be created through productive partnerships. You have trusted me with your mandate and I will never, never let you down.
I know your pain, because I have been there. Look beyond the hardship you have endured. See a new beginning; a new direction; a new spirit. Nigerians, I want you to start to dream again.  What you see in your dreams, we can achieve together.”
With these words, President Goodluck Jonathan on his inauguration as the new Nigeria’s President on May 29, 2011 sealed a pact with Nigerians promising to turn their dreams into reality while declaring that the years of locusts and cankerworms are over.

Even prior to the time, he had during the campaigns, as he crissed-crossed the length and breath of the country drew up similar words that may have prompted Nigerians who massively voted for him during the Presidential election. But when finally he settled in office, President Jonathan appears to be pursuing programmes and polices that obviously don’t receive the endorsement of many Nigerians whose future he promised to secure. More so, they become much more controversial than expected.
Consequently, every step he takes meets stiff resistance from the people.
And so, one wonders if the President is actually serving the interests of Nigerians that voted him into power or that the people themselves have suddenly  not seen good the policies of the man they voted into power.
Past events
Some past issues since the inception of the present administration in May, 2011 may have indicated that most moves taken by the Federal government are rather making the regime unpopular. Barely 7 months in office and at a time Nigerians expected a quick fix of the economy, President Jonathan thought it necessary to delve into heavy political matters.
Thus, he canvassed for a single seven- year term for President and Governors. The issue generated unusual dusts from several quarters that when the bill finally got to the National Assembly, it was already dead on arrival.  Yet, in May this year, the President also came up with the change of name of the University of Lagos to Mushood Abiola University.Till date, the controversy surrounding the development still persists in some sections of the society .
President Goodluck Jonathan
Then came the removal of oil subsidy, the biggest of all policies that attracted almost zero applause from the people. For nine days in early January, 2012, Nigerians closed shop and went on aggressive strike to protest the removal of oil subsidy that suddenly sky-rocketed the pump price of petrol from N65 to N141.
To some analysts, it was not actually the call by the Nigerian Labour Congress, NLC that gave vent to the strike but the pangs of poverty fuelled by anger and the time upon which the subsidy removal came.
And so, there was a spontaneous rash condemnation of the decision from the people who insisted that it must be reversed. Obviously, when it appeared that the showdown could totally cripple the economy, it then became very necessary for the Federal Government to shift grounds and peg the pump price on N97 Naira, per liter of petrol.
Similarly, President Jonathan’s advise to Nigerians to start thinking in the direction of controlling birth rate as a way of circumventing the harsh economic realities of the present age recently was yet another issue that would have stirred up another round of controversy had it been allowed to thrive.
Current Issue
Penultimate week, the Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, Alhaji Sanusi Lamido Sanusi audaciously dropped a bombshell. He said that the apex bank has concluded plans to convert the existing N5, N10 and N20 notes to coins and introduce into the Nigerian market, N5,000 currency note next year. In swift response, organizations, groups, professional associations and Nigerians in their numbers condemned the plan by the CBN, citing several reasons why it must not scale through.
Nigerians React
Envisaging the concomitant effects of the policy largely on Nigerians, the Senate asked the Central Bank to stay action on the planned move to introduce the note. The Chairman, Senate Committee on Banking, Currency and other Financial Institutions, Senator Bassey outrightly asked the CBN governor to put brakes on the move.
He said: “I believe that a project of this nature requires parliamentary approval because there are numerous and fiscal implications on the entire economy.
“This type of action is only taken where there is a major crisis and the CBN must be very careful in order not to send a wrong signal or message to households, domestic sector and even the external ones that the Nigerian currency is valueless, which I believe is definitely not, and that for every unit of value, they need to carry a large quantity of cash.
“The CBN in 2008 and 2009 came up with a proposal to re-denominate the currency; that was even to take off the zeroes.  This was just 2008 and 2009 and here we are in 2012  seeing a kind of policy somersault even though we understand the dynamics of the sector very well.  I believe that we have to be well briefed on this.
“Also in 2005, the CBN undertook a major currency restructuring which ran into billions of naira.  Till date, a proper value has not been done to know its cost to the Nigerian taxpayers and the extent of the benefits in that 2005 coinage.  I think it did not work at all because goldsmiths and blacksmiths converted the coins to molding bangles, earrings and so on. So, we believe that the coinage works very well where there is infrastructure to take it like a half, probably like parking where you go and put it.
“We have not developed that real basic infrastructure and those coins, most of them are nowhere to be found.  So, the CBN will have to prove that the policy is not a clear contradiction or at variance with its cashless society, which they are even yet to justify and whether this is the popular economic way to go.”
Mallam Lamido Sanusi
He further stated, “Actually, we are not really going to rely on laws perse. What we are trying to do here is what is best for the Nigerian people. The Senate is not really against the independence of the CBN, but what we want in place is proper check and that there should be checks and balances in all these things that we do. So, I believe that at some point, we will be able to sit down together and look at the merits and demerits, but till now, we do not know anything about it and we do not know what the people stand to gain and until that is properly put through, we say everything about it must stop.”
Similarly, the House of Representatives through its Banking Committee Chairman, Chukwudi Jones said: “Unfortunately, we are on vacation and we can’t take any legislative action now. But when we are able to get a few members of the committee, we can do something based on the urgency of the matter”.
The lawmaker also stressed that “Our primary concern is that the measure will not hurt the economy and will not affect the daily lives of the average Nigerian”.
Governors’ Forum not aware
The Nigerian Governors Forum is astonished that such a decision has not come up in the National Economic Council which has the Governors of the 36 states of the federation as members.
Hear Governor Gabriel Susuwan of Benue State who is a member of both Groups: “Let me tell you that economically, I don’t support that. I am not an economist, I don’t know what informed that but quite frankly, it means that our naira would be devalued. I don’t know how it would address the economic issues that are confronting us by printing N5, 000 notes, but like I said, I am not an economist. So, I don’t know the nuances of printing N5, 000 notes. If we are saying that we would promote a cashless society and in the same vein printing N5,000 that can make it possible for somebody to carry N10 million in his pocket, I am a bit confused about that. But I expect that this should have been addressed at the National Economic Council meeting. We have never discussed it at any point in time. I am as confused as the man in the street”.

Nigerian Medical Association, NMA, reacts:
The Nigerian Medical Association, said that the decision was borne out of sheer insensitivity by Nigeria’s leaders.
The President of the Association, Dr. Osahon Enabulele, told journalists in Abuja, that the insistence of the CBN governor to carry on with the widely condemned policy was among several critical national issues discussed at the just-concluded National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of the NMA, which held in Owerri, the Imo State capital.
Enabulele also told journalists that the NEC expressed great worry over the proposed introduction of the single N5,000 note, N20 and N50 coins into circulation, on account of the naira devaluation and rise in inflation, which many Nigerians and economists have continued to point out since the policy was first contemplated by Sanusi. He further charged Nigerians to join their voices in the condemnation of the decision.
The position of the Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, is no less of its NMA counter-part.
In a speech in Abuja at the Annual General Conference of the association which held recently, Mr. Joseph Daudu, the immediate past national Chairman of the bar said that the proposal would further
devalue the naira.
“The CBN’s introduction of the N5,000 notes would devalue the naira and it is against the cashless policy being currently promoted by the bank. The proposal by the CBN is shallow and should not be allowed to further damage the already fragile economic system”, he said.
Reacting to the development, Lagos State erstwhile governor, Senator Ahmed Bola Tinubu said the plan is insensitive: “The economy is on reverse, it’s a yoyo economy. This government is not serious; they don’t know
what they are doing.”
In his own reaction,  Ita Enang, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Business and Rules,foresees a situation where the present controversy stirred by Sanusi will truncate President Jonathan second term bid. Said he: “I pray Mr. President should be sensitive to this and take action against the move because I am certain the plan is intended to embarrass the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and to make the government of Goodluck Jonathan unpopular in years to come so that people will not like to vote for him in the next election.
“I think what Sanusi is aiming at with the introduction of the plan against Nigerians is to ensure that the people will be so unhappy with the President that in the next election they would not like to vote for him. Mr. President should therefore call the CBN governor to order with immediate effect”.
The Nigerian Labour Congress, NLC has vowed to stop the process.
It said: “Psychologically, for the working people, it means they work so much for little notes with introduction of N5000. This may fuel crisis of expectation for more wage increase as bigger banknotes will be chasing fewer goods. Nigeria is better with smaller banknotes that can deliver goods and services rather than higher bills without any value”.
Comrade  Abdulwaheed Omar said in Lagos: “Comrades, the recent proposal by the Central Bank of Nigeria is
President ,Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC),Omar Abdulwaheed (middle)  Photo by Gbemiga Olamikan.
one of those policies we must be prepared to vigorously oppose. We see in the proposal a policy contradiction that completely exposes our policy makers as playing the devil’s advocate. Most of these policies are clearly not designed by them but obviously by institutions outside our shores. Comrades, we must collectively oppose this and we must not allow the CBN continue with this clearly unnecessary project. We believe the CBN should not supervise the total collapse of our economy with the introduction of a policy that has historically led to the total collapse or subjugation of the economies of some countries in Africa, Europe and South America”.
He added: “There is no genuine reason for the introduction of N5000 note in a country that is dwindling in production and suffocating under high inflation. While our government complains about lack of funds to reactivate infrastructures critical to economic development, the CBN is planning to spend over N40 billion to produce new denominations of our currency”.
General Secretary of the labour union Comrade Issa Aremu told newsmen in Kaduna recently that the bank should rather be more concerned about improving the value of the Nigerian currency as against others in the international market.
“The current highest bank note of N1000 was introduced in 2005.  We had currency review in 2007 and 2009. It should not be customary for every CBN governor to change the nation’s bank notes.  Incessant turning out of higher bank notes is an attempt to legitimize the devaluation of the Nigerian currency.
There is a direct relationship between higher bank notes and devaluation of the currency. The CBN should concentrate on stabilizing the value of the Naira rather than legitimizing the devaluation of the currency.  CBN under Sanusi Lamido Sanusi should continue with the good work they are doing with respect to revival of manufacturing sector and management of inflation and interest rates.
The double digit inflation rate as we currently have cannot take us out of the economic crisis”, Aremu said.
The Conference of Nigerian Political Parties, CNPP, in a statement signed by its General Secretary, Willy Ezeugwu, accused Sanusi and the economic team of hiding under the new currency to further devalue the naira.
The statement reads: “The decision of the CBN, as endorsed by the so-called economic team, flies in the face of reason, especially when all the explanations and analysis that these clueless officials have so far given are reminiscent of the sing song they engaged in January during the ill-conceived removal of petrol subsidy.
The assurances given at that time turned out to be false as Nigerians feared because today, we all know that the quality of life has worsened since the partial removal of subsidy while most of the supposed palliative buses have vanished into thin air.”
Also, Founder and President of Oodua Peoples Congress (OPC), Dr. Fredrick Fasehun has described the insistence of the government to introduce the N5, 000 note despite people’s opposition as autocratic
and insensitive.
The Medical Doctor said: “Government is in place for the people and not people in place for the government. We will resist the unpalatable morsel they are trying to force down our throat. We will not allow those in power at our instance to dictate undemocratic policy to us and expect us to swallow it hook, line and sinker”.
Apart from the unanimous agitations against the proposal by the associations, some Nigerians have physically staged protests to register their feelings on the issue. For instance, former Federal Lawmaker in the House of Representatives, Honourable Dino Melaye on Thursday led a group of protesters to CBN headquarters in Abuja against the issues.
Under the aegis of Anti Corruption Network, Melaye reiterated the opposition of Nigerians to the currency restructuring policy of CBN. He told Tunde Lemo, Deputy Governor of CBN who received the protesters that the introduction of a single N5000 note will result in inflation and that Nigerians are opposed to it and asked the CBN Governor, Alhaji Sanusi to listen to the views of the people on the matter.
FG’s Meal of Surprise/Defense
Nigerians who had waited to get a good deal from the Federal Government upon whose approval, the CBN carries out the plan were rather flabbergasted when the federal government during the week, arising from the National Economic Management Team (NEMT) threw its weight behind the CBN governor on the action, conspicuously ignoring the cries and submissions of the Nigerian people.
The NEMT, which is headed by the President, comprises the Minister of Finance and coordinating Minister for the Economy, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala; Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the CBN Governor;  Minister of National Planning Dr. Shamsudeen Usman; Director General of the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC); Director General of the Bureau for Public Enterprises (BPE); one representative each of governors of the South and the North as well as key private sector players.
Dr. Shamsheen Usman,  the Economic and National Planning Minister said of t6he plan:
“Clearly, the N5,000 note will not lead to higher inflation. There is absolutely no link. I am an economist; I have been deputy governor(Operations) of the Central Bank. During the last review of the introduction of N1000 note and the various coins, I was deeply involved; it was my responsibility at the Central Bank.
There is absolutely no link between inflation and the currency denomination. So, obviously, the discussion today was basically to endorse. Mr. President had already approved; that is the only requirement by law. The CBN is to propose and Mr. President is to approve. And since Mr. President has approved, really, what is important is to just explain.
I personally had some concerns about the coins but since some
discussion with the CBN governor, he has actually clarified that even the media didn’t understand.
“The coins are being introduced on an introductory basis so that if people accept them and are using them,
then gradually they will withdraw the other notes but they will run concurrently with the notes.
Those were my concerns, initially, because you remember during my time in the CBN, we introduced the one naira and two naira coins. Unfortunately, they were not utilized at all. Part of that is really the value of one naira and two naira today; what can you buy?
So because they are higher denomination, they may be accepted. I think even that aspect didn’t come out well in the communication and so the CBN is going to communicate to Nigerians that the coins will run concurrently with the note.
“They are like testing the waters; if they get accepted and are being utilized, only then will they take subsequent actions.”
Dr. Usman has lieutenants and supporters who see no wrong in the act. One of them is Mr. Atedo Peterside, a banker and NEMT member who argued that besides the fact that it does not add to increase in cost of printing of currency, money, being a store of value, the higher the denomination, the better it is for the economy as those who made money legally and illegally will want to keep their loot in naira rather than hard currency.
He said: “If I were the CBN governor, I will prefer to print N10, 000 notes. Last year, Nigeria spent N47billion to print these small, small notes. If we were printing bigger denominations, we will print fewer number and you make phenomenal savings. Secondly, money is a store of value, all these thieves, rogues and vagabonds running around in various states and all over the country, when they steal money, they will want to keep it outside the banking system.”
Lending his voice in support, the Access Bank Managing Director Aigboje Aig-Imoukuede described the reactions trailing the N5000 note as unfortunate.
He said: “It is very rare for you to have a central bank that does not look at the issue of currency management and issue new notes from time to time based on the reality of the economy. In the case of Nigeria, our economy is such that a N5000 note which is in effect a $30note is not strange.
The greatest argument I have heard about is causing of inflation; the other argument is that it will cost money to introduce the new note.
There is no relationship between the issuance of higher legal tender and inflation. It is unfortunate that some have misled people into thinking that it will lead into higher inflation. Every central bank by the nature of currency management will issue new notes all the time. So, printing of notes is an ongoing operation that every central bank engages in”.
Of course, the big African business mogul and a member of the Economic Team of the President Jonathan, Alhaji Aliko Dangote would have said otherwise just as his counter-part in the oil business, Femi Otedola would as well.
Dangote said: “The introduction of the N5,000 note has nothing to do with inflation. I think it is even to protect the economy. The cost of printing is not anything different from the amount they are using in printing any other note. It is the same cost”.
Meanwhile, CBN’s Director of Corporate Affairs, Mr Ugochukwu Okoroafor said CBN would instead sensitize the public on the introduction of N5,000 note into the economy.
He said: “We are about to carry out sensitization campaign on the introduction of N5000 note and the restructuring of the nation’s other currencies.
Everything will not take off at the first quarter of next year. We are starting with a particular currency in the first quarter of next year; there will still be currency and coins for the denominations that will be coined like N5, N10 and N20 so that both will be operational side by side.”
He added: “We want to be among the top 20 largest economy in 2020; we believe in it. What we should do is pray for Nigeria to have a financial system that can support one of the world’s largest economies. We cannot do it, if we don’t have the right framework. We want to ensure that life is made a lot easier for Nigerians and will continue to improve the system.”
Okoroafor said the report that N40 billion would be spent to print the N5000 note is false, saying the cost is in the CBN annual report.
Analysts have submitted that some other reasons why the decision can’t be allowed to fly at this time included the inability of the government to better the lots of the citizenry.
They asserted that coming at a time the country’s leadership has incessantly pooh-pooed in its promise to restore the security of lives and property, improve on the welfare of the ordinary Nigerians and provide basic social infrastructures,  the government not expect that the Nigerian people will gladly accept what is clearly going to be the reserve of the rich.
Again, in the light of CBN’s cashless society campaign, keen observers queried why a society that does not carry physical cash but makes transfers should suddenly concern itself with the introduction of a higher denomination.
Apart from eclipsing the opportunity posterity would have in knowing Alvan Ikoku and Murtala Mohammed, Nigerian fallen patriots whose faces appear on the N10 and N20 Naira notes respectively, another argument against the CBN’s move is that it will completely obliterate the N5, N10 and N20 notes when converted to coins and ostentatiously give rise to high cost of common goods.
For instance, they said that a sachet of (pure) water will automatically become N50 which will certainly make
mockery of the Naira.
In a similar move by the same CBN under Professor Charles Soludo during ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo regime, the government assured the people that N1.00 note when converted to coins will be a tool for figure counting for infants and posterity. But today, suffice it to say, N1.00 is neither seen in circulation as such nor carried by anybody even traders.
Indeed, with this array of threats and condemnation, most analysts posit that a little less, if not more of what Nigerians experienced during the oil subsidy strike in January this year, might be in the offing should the Federal Government and CBN forge ahead with the currency devaluation exercise. But until then, Nigerians are watching with keen interests.

SANUSI LAMIDO SANUSI (BRIEF HISTORY)---CBN GOVERNOR

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Sanusi Lamido Sanusi
Sanusi at the 2011 Time 100 gala
Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria
Incumbent
Assumed office
3 June 2009
Preceded byProf. Charles Chukwuma Soludo, CFR
Personal details
   Born(1961-07-31) 31 July 1961 (age 51)

    Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi (born 31 July 1961) was appointed Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria on 3 June 2009.] He is a career banker and ranking Fulani nobleman, and also serves as a respected Islamic scholar. The renowned global financial intelliegence magazine, The Banker, published by the Financial Times, has conferred on Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi two awards. He has been recognised with the global award for Central Bank Governor of the Year, as well as for Central Bank Governor of the Year for Africa. The TIME magazine also listed Sanusi in its TIMES 100 list of most influential people of 2011

 

 Birth and education

Sanusi was born on July 31, 1961. His father was a Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the 1960s and his grandfather was Emir of Kano and Islamic Scholar, Alhaji Muhammadu Sanusi. Sanusi graduated from King's College Lagos in 1977 and studied at Ahmadu Bello University (ABU), Zaria earning a BSc in Economics in 1981. He then taught economics at ABU from 1983 to 1985. He also obtained a degree in Islamic law from International University of Africa, Khartoum.

 Banking career

In 1985 Sanusi joined Icon Limited (Merchant Bankers), a subsidiary of Morgan Guaranty Trust Bank of New York, and Baring Brothers of London. He moved to the United Bank for Africa in 1997 in the Credit and Risk Management Division, rising to the position of a General Manager. In September 2005, he joined the Board of First Bank of Nigeria as an Executive Director in charge of Risk and Management Control, and was appointed Group Managing Director (CEO) in January 2009. He was also the Chairman, Kakawa Discount House and sat on the Board of FBN Bank (UK) Limited. Sanusi is recognized in the banking industry for his contribution towards developing a Risk Management culture in the Nigerian banking sector. First Bank is Nigeria's oldest bank and one of the biggest financial institutions in Africa. Sanusi was the first Northerner to be appointed CEO in First Bank's history of more than a century.[

 Governor of the Central Bank

Governor Lamido Sanusi speaking at Warwick Economics Summit
President Umaru Musa Yar'Adua nominated Sanusi as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria on 1 June 2009 and his appointment was confirmed by the Senate on 3 June 2009, in the middle of a global financial crisis. Analysts believed that Sanusi's tempered mien would serve as a counterpoise to the more aloof disposition of his predecessor, Charles Chukwuma Soludo. Based on his past record it seemed probable that as governor of the central bank he would impose stricter controls.
In August 2009, the Sanusi led Central Bank of Nigeria bailed out Afribank, Intercontinental Bank, Union Bank, Oceanic Bank and Finbank with 400 billion naira of public money, and dismissed their chief executives. He said "We had to move in to send a strong signal that such recklessness on the part of bank executives will no longer be tolerated." 16 senior bank officials face charges that included fraud, lending to fake companies, giving loans to companies they had a personal interest in and conspiring with stockbrokers to boost share prices. In September 2009 he said that 15 of the current 24 Nigerian banks might survive reform in the banking sector.
In a wide-ranging interview with the Financial Times in December 2009, Sanusi defended the extensive reforms that he had initiated since taking office, dubbed by some as the "Sanusi tsunami". He noted that there was no choice but to attack the many powerful and interrelated vested interests who were exploiting the financial system, and expressed his appreciation of support from the Presidency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, the Finance minister and others.
In January 2010 Sanusi said that banks will only want to give credit to the Nigeria’s Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) if the government gives adequate attention to the provision of infrastructure.
In January 2010 Sanusi admitted that since 2005 the Central Bank had not conducted routine examinations of the 14 banks allocated to it under the sharing arrangement with Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation (NDIC).Abubakar Nagona, president of Integrated Development and Investment Service (IDIS), a venture capital investment company urged Sanusi to "not be cowed and succumb to undue pressure from operators of the same sector he is striving to bring sanity to." At a February 2010 conference on banking in Nigeria, Sanusi described his blueprint for reforming the Nigerian financial system. He said that it was built around four pillars of enhancing the quality of banks, establishing financial stability, enabling healthy financial sector evolution and ensuring that the financial sector contributes to the real economy. Talking later that month, Sanusi said that the crash in the capital market was due to high level financial illiteracy on the part of the Nigerian investors.
The Banker unanimously recognised him as the Central Bank Governor of the Year 2010 citing his radical anti-corruption campaign aimed at saving 24 banks on the brink of collapse and pressing for the managers involved in the most blatant cases of corruption to be charged and, in the case of two senior bankers, imprisoned.
Governor Sanusi has spoken at many distinguished events, including Warwick Economics Summit in February 2012 where he spoke about Banking Reforms in Nigeria and their impact on the Economy.[20]

 Sharia authority

In parallel to his banking career, Sanusi contributed to the debate over Sharia law. In 1997, Sanusi obtained a degree in Sharia and Islamic Studies from the African International University in Khartoum, Sudan.[ Writing in the Weekly Trust in September 2000, he noted the problem of reconciling "belief in the universal and eternal applicability of the Shariah with the need for a wholesale adoption of its historically specific interpretation to meet the requirements of a particular milieu." He further said that "Even a cursory student of Islamic history knows that all the trappings of gender inequality present in the Muslim society have socio-economic and cultural, as opposed to religious roots."
At a conference in 2000 in Kaduna, Sanusi delivered a lecture on Islamic economics called Institutional Framework of Zakat: Dimension and Implications. He argued that although collection of zakat is the responsibility of the state, it may be the responsibility of the Nigerian government rather than the emirs in Northern Nigeria. In July 2001 at a seminar in Abuja he talked on Basic Needs and Redistributive Justice in Islam – The Panacea to Poverty in Nigeria. He took the mainstream position that zakat is an instrument for redistributing income, but argued in favor of giving the role of redistribution to the government.
In October 2002 he published a paper on The Hudhood Punishments in Northern Nigeria: A Muslim Criticism. In July 2003 he presented The Shari'a Debate and the Construction of a 'Muslim' Identity in Northern Nigeria: A Critical Perspective at a seminar at the University of Bayreuth. In August 2003 he presented Democracy, Rights and Islam: Theory, Epistemology and the Quest for Synthesis at an international conference on Shari'ah Penal and Family Law in Nigeria and in the Muslim World: A Rights-Based Approach in Abuja.]
There are two underlying themes to Sanusi's position. First, Islam is concerned with delivering justice and should not be a tool for self-seeking political agendas. Second, the Wahhabist rhetoric of fundamentalists is counter to genuine Muslim interests. He explains that Sharia is not divine but merely religious, and is neither uniform nor unchanging

TOP 10 ACCOUNTING PROBLEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS

 

  In late 2001, the Arthur Andersen and Enron scandals in America drew attention to the problems of accounting and the scale of corruption that is possible through misappropriation of accounting in business organizations. One of the largest bankruptcy in history, it shook the financial world as it led to closing of Arthur Andersen, one of the world's top five accounting firms. This reveals how accounting rules are abused to paint a rosy picture of business growth contradictory to what might really be happening in a company. Accounting problems build over time and needs visionary and intelligent analysis of facts and figures in order to understand what lies ahead. As a member of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Charles Niemeier says, "Problems at the root of the accounting environment are more like the mozo bamboo plant. The South-East Asian bamboo plant can appear to lie dormant for up to five years before growing as much as a foot a day and to more than 100 feet in the coming years. The suddenness of that growth spurt is a bit deceptive though for as much of those early years the plant was developing a complex root system. It's only then that it has the foundation for its shoots to take off." Accordingly accounting problems too build up over time. When kept unchecked, accounting problems and misappropriations have lead to bankruptcy of many leading multinational companies as was seen in the past.

The top ten accounting problems are:

1. Playing with numbers

There can be many irregularities done while maintaining the accounts for a company such as the finance department may inflate the reported earnings of a company or company officials asking the accounts department to change the figures in order to show higher profits in business and gain personal benefits such as promotions, bonuses etc. They can show more profits than it actually is by \'gaming with the numbers”. This will increase their market share value for a short time but in the longer run the company might just end up in bankruptcy. This was as seen in one of the Fortune 500 companies. In a report of \' Congressional Research Service - The Library of Congress” says, in April, 2002, \' Xerox 120” paid a $10 million fine (the largest ever imposed in an accounting case) to settle an SEC complaint and restated its reported income since 1997. The SEC found that Xerox had improperly inflated its reported earnings by over $3 billion, primarily by recognizing future payments as current income. For example, revenue from long-term leases of Xerox equipment was reported immediately rather than at the time payments were received.

2. Not so clear

There is often lack of transparency in showcasing financial statements in an organization. There is a need for developed and standard accounting methods to have a clearer picture, both in private and public sector companies. Otherwise, this can misled the investors about the actual status of their investments and business growth. For e.g. Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation (formerly known as Enron Corporation), an American energy company, reported a revenue of $111 billion in 2000. Fortune declared it as \' America\'s most innovative company” for six consecutive years. But in late 2001, it was found that the positive financial growth was mostly manipulated through systematic and creatively designed accounting fraud. The profits and revenue of the company were result of deals with special purpose entities (limited partnership which it controlled). Hence, the debts and the losses were not reported in its financial statements. The share value of the company fell drastically from $ 90.00 to just pennies. As Enron was considered as a blue chip stock, the investors were devastated. Owing to complex financial statements that were published for the shareholders, it was years before the investors even had the slightest clue that something was going terribly wrong. The lack of transparency in the financial statements has often resulted in such cases of bankruptcy where the investors are the worst hit.

3. Accounting methods

There are often confusions as the finance department cannot judge which system of accounting will be best suited for the smooth functioning of a company. Like the finance department in a medical centre might be confused on how to account for patients coming with ailments that require long term treatment. Critics say that while accounting long collection period may indicate that revenue was over billed and ultimately may be uncollectible. There is a need for the evolution of a new era of standard accounting regulations as the world prepares for the convergence of national, international and multijurisdictional planes especially for publicly traded entities.

4. Dealing with outside agencies

The finance department often faces problems while dealing with outside agencies such as government departments, including tax departments etc., while seeking for sanctions or permissions etc. There is always a need for professional and dynamic accountants who can handle this shortcoming with intelligence.

5. Lack of communication

It is most often seen that there is a lack of intra-departmental communication between the finance department handling accounting and the management body of an organization. This makes it difficult for the finance department to keep a track of the business growth of the organization and even warn of possible threats it can face in the future. An accountant handling the figures of an organization on a daily basis most often develops expertise in analyzing the business and even may help in forming future strategies and contribute positively towards business growth of the organization. But in most cases the finance department is not involved while taking major decisions for the organization.

6. Reporting at gross

In some companies, the accounting is done based on reporting at gross. This led to inflating market share proportions. For e.g., eBay.com included the entire price of auctioned items into its revenue even though it had no ownership or credit risk for items auctioned online.

7. Revenue issues

The accountants may also face problems in determining what should be considered as revenues while accounting for an organization. There are often questions whether what is billed is considered as revenue or should it get logged only when the company receives the payments.

8. Human errors

There can also be human errors such as typographical mistakes. Such mistakes might lead to problems in the final tallying of the balance sheets.

9. Lazy bones

There can also be issues in accounting if the transactions are not updated on a daily basis. The accountant may forget to make entries of data of previous dates. This can lead to a faulty balance sheet.

10. Keeping an eye

The finance department might also face problems in the absence of a strong hierarchal administrative system. Such systems are highly recommended for keeping a check on any kind of misappropriation, whether deliberate or done by mistake. These problems can be tackled in various ways. With the advent of globalization, the meaning of accounting and finance is constantly being redefined. The expanding purview of financial services has solutions for any problem under the sun. All that is required is to find the right way. Louis Grumet, publisher of The CPA Journal and executive director of New York State Society‘s of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA), says,Over the past couple of years, serious issues have been raised about the quality of audits of publicly funded entities across the country, including the state of New York. The public entities questioned include school districts, nursing homes, fire districts, waste disposal sites, and public authorities. To address such concerns, a rising tide of legislation has been deliberated in statehouses and capitols. The profession needs to be better equipped to limit the risk of fraud in these entities and maintain the public trust when it comes to the use of taxpayers‘ money. Taxpayers should not be taking risks when they pay their taxes. As the financial world evolves in a borderless, technologically advanced era, effective regulation of the profession through an interstate compact and the implementation of accounting academies would better serve and protect the public. Our nation‘s physical borders are no longer the only borders that require well-prepared and well-educated sentries.

CURRENT ISSUES FACING THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION ( world Accountants)

        Regulatory oversight and change is the most important issue currently facing the accounting profession.
       Large-scale changes, such as the proposals by the European Commission and the PCAOB to reform audit firm rotation and the auditor’s report have potentially far-reaching implications on audit quality and competitiveness in the accounting industry. I believe that any new regulation needs to be studied carefully to ensure it will truly enhance audit quality and will not have unintended consequences for our profession or the investors and businesses we serve. In addition, we need to ensure that regulation is not so restrictive that it damages the audit profession’s Advertisement
     Overall, I think the regulators for our industry both here and abroad take the approach of seeking input from many parties prior to enacting new regulations, and I believe it is important that these activities continue. However, I ultimately don’t believe independence, skepticism and objectivity can be legislated. Quality, objectivity and ability to be competitive or to maintain its status as a sought-after career alternative for the best and brightest students.integrity are values that auditors have embraced for many years and ones that have enabled our profession to be one of the most respected. To further embed these values at McGladrey, we recently created a new professional judgment framework with three professors from the Brigham Young University School of Accountancy. All assurance professionals have received a printed copy and are being trained in the framework this year.
In addition to the regulation of our own industry, the significant number of new regulations that affect the clients and industries we serve could also have huge implications for McGladrey and other accounting firms. We have to stay abreast of the changing regulations in our clients’ industries and align our work products and advice accordingly. In addition, we expect to see an increase in demand for assurance, tax and business consulting services as a result of these regulations, particularly in the middle-market companies McGladrey serves.
Companies of this size typically have more limited resources and lack the capacity to implement complex standards and regulations on their own. McGladrey’s leadership team, organizational structure and strategy are centered on providing this type of support to our private clients. With more than 6,500 employees working in 75 offices across the country, we are able to provide national and international expertise with the local touch of a service team in our clients’ markets. We believe our understanding and experience will enable us to help our clients navigate these new business and compliance challenges.
Joe Adams -- Managing partner and CEO, McGladrey LLP

     Loss of investor confidence in audit firms and their opinions. Also, loss of investor confidence in financial statements. Also, loss of investor confidence in the fairness of capital markets (Mary Schapiro has made speeches about this very issue). Unfortunately, much of this has been caused by large audit opinions somehow being associated with accounting scandals and audit failures.
Dave Albrecht -- Professor of accounting, University of South Carolina Upstate

    Attracting and retaining young talent has been an issue for many years, but I think that with the sharper dropoff in recent years the issue has become acute. We, as a profession, need to make a more concerted effort to fundamentally change how we work. The AICPA and various state societies are working hard to project a more attractive image tailored to the qualities that the next generation is seeking in a career, but if their experience doesn’t meet these expectations, we will continue to see a talent drain.
Mark Albrecht -- CEO, XCM Solutions/Xpitax LLC

I believe the most important issue currently is whether there will be adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by U.S regulators and how that will affect current accountants (different rules for small business than large business?), future accountants (do schools teach the new standards or GAAP?), and financial statement uses, who may have to reconcile two equally acceptable standards, which may be inconsistent with each other.
John Ams -- Executive vice president, National Society of Accountants

How to generate sustained growth and adequately reward existing and aspiring partners.
Rick Anderson -- Chairman and CEO, Moss Adams

      The accounting profession has many facets. The top challenge faced by the majority of practitioners (the small and medium-sized firms) is the overwhelming burden of new regulations and standards. This one issue impacts several areas of the firm, from quality control, risk management to training.
Where there are so many regulations and standards, it forces accountants (especially in smaller firms) to spend less time helping their clients solve real problems. The same might be true for larger firms, since the service providers are more concerned (read spend more time) about compliance and risk management, rather than on other issues the client may be facing.
How can we expect CPAs to be nimble in a world with overwhelming new regulations and standards?
August Aquila -- President and CEO, Aquila Global Advisors, LLC

   There are many, but the most important one is the same one that we’ve been facing for the past six years -- the poor economy. But for us, this tough economy has been a real motivator because it enforces a constant discipline upon our teams that requires them to be much better than our competition. The crash and slow economic recovery have exerted downward pressure on tax and audit prices and made the competitive landscape very challenging. But this has forced us to get much better at everything and to develop strategies that require us to look at our clients much more holistically so that we become a business solution provider and not just vendors of technical expertise.
Our firm focuses on the aspirations of our clients and we help them achieve those aspirations. The strategies we craft for them and the products we help them deploy must all work to that purpose and must give them a competitive advantage. We must bring our know-how and ingenuity to a comprehensive package of service and provide insight that CFOs and other executives need to survive and flourish in this economy. We’ve expanded into many areas that we never thought we’d move into, such as our growing customer relationship management practice within our consulting group or our AMF Media Group division, which provides strategic branding and marketing support, public relations and corporate communications for a very wide variety of clients. The bottom line is that if we diligently hone our strategy, improve our technical expertise and keep looking at the horizon for new trends, when the economy does turn, we will be ahead of the pack in terms of reputation and capabilities and will experience even greater growth and profitability.
Andrew Armanino -- Managing partner and CEO, Armanino McKenna

   Technology is clearly transforming how firms provide services to their clients. Clients are looking for their firms to collaborate with them and leverage technology to improve their capabilities and digital presence. Client accounting is probably the greatest growth opportunity for the profession, due to these capabilities driven by cloud computing. To me, embracing change and making the right technology choices to fully transform into what we are calling a digital CPA is one the most important issues going forward.
Erik Asgeirsson -- CEO, CPA2Biz

   The uncertainty of the financial/economic market, which continues to give our clients concern and caution.
Kenneth Baggett -- Managing principal and CEO, Reznick Group

     People are not going to like this, but I’d say: relevancy. Many CPAs are nothing more than high-priced bookkeepers and unless they move away from the idea that they’re historians with bad memories, who can only report on the past, on lagging indicators, they’re future is perilous.
You go into a lot of these firms and they’re doing very low-level work and then they sit around and complain and moan that it’s a commodity. Well, sure. It’s relatively low-value stuff, and if that’s all you’re doing, then you’re going to be stuck with government regulation and compliance revenue, and I see that as the biggest threat to our profession.

MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH FOR ANAN

                   
                            By Anayo Ezugwu           sunday,22 july 2012

        
      
       Association of National Accountants of Nigeria, ANAN, is now set to become member of the International Federation of Accountants, IFAC
     The Association of National Accountants of Nigeria, ANAN, is in the threshold of getting recognition by the International Federation of Accountants, IFAC. Maryam Ladi Ibrahim, president of the association, said during a courtesy visit of the association to Newswatch last Wednesday, that ANAN recorded a major breakthrough in connection with its quest for membership of IFAC recently   when the application form it submitted  for registration was endorsed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria, ICAN.
Ibrahim recalled that in 2010 when ANAN initially submitted its application together with sponsorship report from the Institute of Public Accountants, IPA, of Austria, the application was not processed because it was not accompanied by sponsorship report from ICAN.  That hurdle is over.  ICAN has now submitted a sponsorship report and given ANAN a clean bill of health for IFAC membership. She explained that based on the progress so far recorded in the processing of the application, IFAC verification telephone conference was held with ANAN on February, 20, 2012. “We now await the report of the processing of our membership application,” she said.
Apart from its efforts to secure IFAC membership registration, ANAN under her leadership has become popular. It has also achieved a lot in fostering a good relationship with key institutional heads in both the private and public sectors of the economy and the legislative arms of government at the federal and state levels. She said ANAN has done a lot in helping national development through its contributions to policy making, and building a better future for the accounting profession in the country.
The association under her leadership, commissioned a “Think Tank” committee to assist the government realise its transformation agenda and to produce a position paper on the economic thrust of the country.  “The association under my leadership has continued to contribute meaningfully to national debate by adding its voice to the topical issues that affect the profession and the country at large,” she said.
She also has plans to reposition ANAN. She wants ANAN to become a virile home-grown accountancy body, which would provide a path to a recognised professional qualification of the highest international standard. The National College of Accounting where ANAN trains graduates take a two-year intensive professional course before they can join ANAN as members will soon move to its permanent site in Jos, Plateau State.  She said the goal was to turn it into a centre of excellence for teaching accountancy in Nigeria and Africa. According to the ANAN president, the temporary site would be turned into an entrepreneurship training centre, where the members could go for skills development. Presently, the association has about 19,000 membership fully registered and trained by the college, with over 3,000 students undergoing training in the college. The association also retains all it members and evaluates them every three years, for them to be more relevant to the profession. ANAN has also equipped accounting departments of many universities and polytechnics and organised series of interactive sessions with accounting students across the country.
The association is also currently battling to correct the disparity between the products of ICAN and ANAN in the point of entry into the civil service. “The law of the land stipulates that any professional should be placed on grade level 10, but ANAN members are all placed on level nine. She is hopeful that this would be corrected soon.
She said the association abhors corruption in all its ramifications among its members. Against this background, she said that ANAN   was ready to punish any member of the body involved in corruption if the organisation where such person works reports the case.  In such cases, the body would set up a panel to probe such persons.  
Ibrahim was accompanied to Newswatch by Terkaa Iyoryer Gemade, registrar of the association. Gemade told Newswatch that the association was moving to the next level in the drive to achieve its mission. “The association has recorded landmarks under the new president even though there were few challenges occasioned by the state of the nation’s security. This administration has been in top gear in organising programmes that are of benefit to members of the association,” he said. He commended Newswatch for blazing the trail in journalism in the country.
Femi Ige, chief operating officer of Newswatch who welcomed the management team of ANAN to the corporate headquarters of the company in Oregun, Lagos, promised the association full support in realising its objective of promoting professionalism in accountancy in Nigeria.
The formation of ANAN in 1979 met stiff opposition as ICAN claimed that by virtue of ICAN Act 15 of 1965, the institute has the sole regulatory power over accountancy profession in Nigeria. Its leaders had argued that as long as the Act remained in force, no other professional body could come into existence, unless authorised by the institute.    However, in recent times both ICAN and ANAN have put the bitter rivalry behind them and have been working together in the interest of the accountancy profession in particular and the nation at large.    

COOPERATION BETWEEN ICAN & ANAN

 


 
  

HOS EXPRESSES DELIGHT OVER CO

OPERATION     BETWEEN    ICAN   &   ANAN
OFFICE OF THE HEAD OF THE CIVIL SERVICE OF THE FEDERATION
Press Release
HOS EXPRESSES DELIGHT OVER COOPERATION BETWEEN ICAN & ANAN
The Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Alhaji Isa Bello Sali has expressed delight that the main professional accountancy bodies in Nigeria, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN) and the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria (ANAN) now relate cordially and are cooperating with each other to move the profession forward.
Alhaji Isa Bello Sali made this remark when the members of the Council of the Association of National Accountants of Nigeria (ANAN), led by its President and Chairman of Council, Hajiya Maryam Ladi Ibrahim paid him a courtesy call in Abuja.
Speaking further, the Head of Service said that the time has come when what should be of paramount importance to members of the two professional bodies is to fully join governments nationwide to fight the scourge of corruption, which he said their members are strategically placed in the public service to do.
On the issue of entry point for some professional cadres in the civil service, the Head of Service explained that the National Council on Establishments at its last meeting held at Akure, Ondo State, resolved to re-examine the issue holistically and ensure that a unified method is adopted for all professional bodies in the country.
Earlier in her address, the President and Chairman of Council of the Association, Hajiya Maryam Ladi Ibrahim, briefed the Head of Service on developments in the accountancy profession in Nigeria and on some establishment issues that are of relevance to the Association.
Signed
Tope Ajakaiye
Deputy Director (Press & Public Relations)
For: Head of the Civil Service of the Federation
26th July, 2012.